5 raisons de NE PAS télécharger votre musique ou vos vidéos à un tiers

Conditions d'utilisation maléfiquesCombien d'entre vous lisent les «Conditions d'utilisation»? Si vous fournissez du contenu via un tiers, vous voudrez peut-être le repenser. Il y a de fortes chances qu'ils aient des droits complets et libres de droits pour gérer et distribuer votre contenu sans jamais vous rémunérer pour cela. Si vous allez avoir la peine de couper une vidéo, un mp3, un podcast, etc…. dépensez l'argent et hébergez-le vous-même. De cette façon, vous n'avez pas à accepter certaines de ces conditions d'utilisation bizarres qui permettront à une grande entreprise de gagner encore PLUS d'argent avec votre contenu.

Si vous mettez en ligne une vidéo sur Youtube et que Youtube en obtient un million de visites… il vous suffit de mettre de l'argent dans leur poche! Pourquoi ferais-tu ça?

  • Youtube - vous accordez par la présente à Youtube une licence mondiale, non exclusive, libre de droits, sous-licenciable et transférable pour utiliser, reproduire, distribuer, préparer des œuvres dérivées, afficher et exécuter les soumissions d'utilisateur en relation avec le site Web Youtube et Youtube (et son successeur), y compris, sans s'y limiter, la promotion et la redistribution d'une partie ou de la totalité du site Web Youtube (et des œuvres dérivées de celui-ci) dans tous les formats de médias et via tous les canaux de médias.
  • Google - vous dirigez et autorisez Google vers, et accordez à Google un droit et une licence libres de droits et non exclusifs pour héberger, mettre en cache, acheminer, transmettre, stocker, copier, modifier, distribuer, exécuter, afficher, reformater, extrait, faciliter la vente ou la location de copies de, analyser et créer des algorithmes basés sur le contenu autorisé afin de (i) héberger le contenu autorisé sur les serveurs de Google, (ii) indexer le contenu autorisé; (iii) afficher, exécuter et distribuer le contenu autorisé
  • MySpace - En affichant ou en publiant («publiant») tout contenu sur ou via les services MySpace, vous accordez par la présente à MySpace.com une licence limitée pour utiliser, modifier, exécuter publiquement, afficher publiquement, reproduire et distribuer ce contenu uniquement sur et via les services MySpace.
  • FLURL - Vous accordez par la présente au Service une licence non exclusive pour publier, commercialiser, vendre, concéder sous licence, exploiter et utiliser de quelque manière que ce soit tous les éléments fournis au Service, au Site Web et / ou utilisés de quelque manière que ce soit avec le Service, y compris mais limité à la musique, les photographies, le matériel littéraire, l'art, les noms, les titres et logos, les marques déposées et toute autre propriété intellectuelle. Vous ne serez pas rémunéré pour les téléchargements ou tout autre matériel fourni au Service.
  • DropShots - DropShots est, sauf indication contraire, le propriétaire de tous les droits d'auteur et de base de données sur le Service et son contenu. Vous ne pouvez pas publier, distribuer, extraire, réutiliser ou reproduire un tel contenu sous quelque forme matérielle que ce soit (y compris la photocopie ou le stockage sur tout support par voie électronique) autrement que conformément à la licence d'utilisation limitée énoncée dans notre avis de droit d'auteur.

Arrêtez de donner votre contenu gratuitement! Les grandes entreprises promettent de ne JAMAIS utiliser votre contenu au-delà de la distribution via le site Web. Les grandes entreprises fourniront une compensation si elles utilisent votre contenu en dehors du site. Et les grandes entreprises vous permettront également de continuer à POSSÉDER votre contenu, même après avoir quitté leur service.

Lisez les conditions d'utilisation!

11 Commentaires

  1. 1
  2. 2

    Salut Duana,

    I’m currently getting 500 script error on their site…
    I’ll check out the Terms of Use when they are back up. I’m not an attorney – just simply have observed many articles and discussions talking about these content aggregators truly misinforming their users on who ‘owns’ the content, how it can be utilized, and whether or not the content provider could ever be compensated for the use.

    Doug

  3. 3

    Very good post, Doug.
    Especially taking into account that even rich media hosting does no longer cost an arm et a leg… (Here I can recommend Temple des médias to which I switched after having been faithful to my original server supplier for about 5 years. They have very high customer satisfaction, and I was amazed at the speed at which they reply to non-geeky customer e-mails. (And no, I am not employed by them…)

    Another reason for not hosting you own content on a 3rd party is, you never know how they change their policies in the future – well, or you never know how you change yours… (Imagine that you make a cool video/song that you put online, and some marketing institution wants to buy it off you – you cannot actually sell it once you agreed to the terms that Doug has laid out…)
    So: host yourself. Be happy. Be creative.

    And as a plug, here are some videos that I shot.

  4. 4

    Salut Doug,

    I just wanted to quickly remark on your article. Kudos to you for encouraging artists considering submitting their media to a third party host/distributor. Indeed, too many creative people fail to consider the business and legal aspects of the entertainment industry and intellectual property, and it can be easy for opportunistic people — be they managers, agents, record labels (big or small), or website operators — to take advantage of those who lack business acumen or a basic understanding of U.S. copyright law.

    That having been said, third-party publishers and distributors are left with no choice but to require that copyright owners grant the third-party a non exclusif license to certain rights of the copyright holder (the artist), entre autresthe rights to reproduce, distribute, and publicly display the copyrighted material. Otherwise, the third-party publisher is subject to liability for copyright infringement. That is why the language in the aforementioned terms of use agreements is so similar (and our website is certainly no exception).

    If a third-party publisher seeks an exclusif license, then that is suspect, and that service should probably be avoided, depending on the circumstances.

    Sincèrement,

    James Anderson
    Membre gérant
    Spirit of Radio LLC

  5. 5
  6. 6

    Please tell us of which great companies you speak at the end of your post! You leave me hanging! I would love to maintain all rights over my music, yet I am forced to utilize some mediums for the simple fact that is where the audience lies.

    I happen to think social architecture sites, REAL ones, such as tribe.net are ripe grounds for artist controlled media dispersal. At this juncture that particular one is without music hosting capabilities, yet it does allow embedded links to content sites like YouTube. I have a MySpace account which is linked with SnowCap, wherin I may set the price of the song, which they then markup. I have only been toying with it and need more exposure, so I have to consider hosting my work elsewhere. The large sites seem to be on the verge of saturation and fully slanted to video over sound only.

  7. 7

    Salut Timothy,

    All of the major companies have been revamping their terms of use and continue to do so on an ongoing basis. It would require continuous review. I’m only warning people that they must review all terms of use before uploading anything they ‘think’ they own. I would hate to see someone lose the rights to their music or video simply by uploading it to a server… where someone else can make a buck off of it!

    Salutations,
    Doug

  8. 8

    Here a valid alternative Kiqlo
    Kiqlo is not interested in the getting the rights on your content. Kiqlo allow you to sell your content while you keep your copyright. You can upload it for free, sell it for free and Kiqlo does not take any cut out of it. It is true! No Catch!
    You can download, upload without login. If you want to sell you need to be logged in. It is a new concept but it is exactly for this purpose.

    Kiqlo

  9. 9

    Please let us know what you think about Ourstage.com. My wife and I are both songwriters and we have placed quite a few songs on their site. The first few days we were placed in the top 10 with a few even going to number one in our region and after 4 to 5 days, all our songs drop to the bottom or middle of the ratings and the voting of our songs don’t make a lick of sense to either one of us?? They claim that all rights remain ours and that all sales will go to our paypal account but so far we haven’t made a bloody penny off of our posted songs. Are we being taken for a ride? I did read most of the agreement but not all. I ass-u-med everything was on the up and up but after reading your five reasons I’m not so sure?

    Thank you for your blog. Have a good day and may you feel the blessings of what life and love have for you on a day to day basis.

    In His Blessed name,

    Marvin Patton

  10. 10

    On the other hand dont upload your music anywhere and be annonymous for the rest of your life!

    Yes, always read the terms and conditions (you'd be too trusting not to) and most of the time these wont be abused.
    I think its a matter of giving a little to get a little, you cant expect exposure without exposing yourself (excuse the expression) I am a composer who writes for TV/film, I manage to make a decent living out of it and I wouldnt stand a chance in hell if I hadn't trusted people not to abuse the faith in them that I had put by handing over my music. (and I still have to do this all the time, otherwise work would dry up)
    The most abuse of my music has come after when my music had aired on TV and then went up for sale officially on iTunes etc, someone decided to buy it then put it on a fansite of the TV show it came from, for free download.

    I get paid by youtube when my music gets played because thats the real way it works, not like the article says (I am a member of a collection society that makes sure of that) PRS

    So please dont be put off by this article.

  11. 11

    Do you think that people will flock to your site in the back-assed part of the internet to see a few videos? People go to Youtube and other sites because they are popular and people are way more likely to see their content. I’d say a good 80%+ of the uploader population doesn’t care whether they use it or not anyway, I know I don’t. Sure they get free hits on their site, but that’s their business. You wouldn’t be uploading to them if they didn’t get hits. The only way buying a site and getting a copyright on your content is if you are a well known, popular group who produces a lot of videos and/or pictures. Otherwise you’re just tooting your own horn and trying to be important.

    3/10

Que pensez-vous?

Ce site utilise Akismet pour réduire les spams. Découvrez comment sont traitées les données de vos commentaires..